[ Return to APA Home Page ]

    Search
    Site Map
    Contact Us
    National Office News
    Letters to the Executive
     Director

Meetings & Divisions
    Secretary-Treasurers
    Central
    Eastern
    Pacific
    Annual Meetings
    Paper Submissions
    Travel Stipends & Grants

Governance
    By-Laws
    Board of Officers

    Board Meeting Minutes
    Committees
    National Office
    History of the APA
    Reprinting Policies &

      Permission Fees

Profession
    Data
    APA Statements
    Average Faculty Salaries

Advertising
    Advertising
    Advertising in JFP
    Schedules & Deadlines

Resources
    Conferences, Seminars
      & Calls for Papers

    JobSeeker Database
    Teaching Committee's
      Online Resource Center
    Streaming Video

    Philosophy in the News
    Prizes & Awards

    Web Resources
    Department Web Sites

    Other Organizations of
      Related Interest

Publications & Merchandise
    Publications &
    Merchandise list

    APA Newsletters

    Other Publications
    Schedules & Deadlines

Member Services
    Membership Info
    Becoming a Member

Members Only Section
    Login

    Member Section Index
  Services:

    Membership Directory
  Resources:
    Jobs for Philosophers
    APA Newsletters
    Member Home Pages
    Proceedings & Addresses
    Grants, Fellowships and Prizes
    Sabbatical Housing

APA Committee for
Defense of Professional
Rights of Philosophers

Committee Report
1996


The following appeared in Volume 70, Number 5 (May, 1997) of the Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association.


Richard Wasserstrom, Chair

The Committee received three formal complaints from APA members. One dealt with denial of tenure, another with the wrongful termination of a faculty member. The case concerning the denial of a promotion was resolved in a manner satisfactory to the complainant, although, due to an oversight on the part of the Chair in the handling of this complaint, the satisfactory result was achieved largely without the Committee's assistance. The other two cases remain open. The case concerning the denial of tenure was determined to be premature in that the final tenure decision had not yet been made, and the case involving the allegation of wrongful termination was received too late in the academic year to be considered by the present Committee.

The Committee also had before it one complaint that had been lodged with it at the end of the preceding academic year. It concerned a claim of marital discrimination against one of the finalists in an advertised, tenure-track job search. In that case, the Committee determined that the complaint made out a prima facie case of the violation of the complainants' professional rights, and, as is the Committee's practice in such cases, the Chair invited the department in question to respond to the factual allegations made by the complainant. The department denied all of the relevant allegations and asserted that the hiring decision had been made without regard to the complainant's marital status. At present the case remains unresolved and still open, pending the outcome of additional fact-finding that is being undertaken by a state agency, pursuant to a claim of discrimination that the complainant also made to that agency.

In addition to coordinating the Committee's response to these formal complaints, the Chair also informally counseled several APA members who inquired about various problems and potential complaints.



Copyright 2000, The American Philosophical Association.
Last revised: August 28, 2001