![[ Return to APA Home Page ]](http://www.apa.udel.edu/apa/pix/new.gif) Search
Site
Map
Contact Us National Office News
Letters to the Executive
Director
Meetings & Divisions
Secretary-Treasurers
Central
Eastern
Pacific
Annual Meetings
Paper Submissions
Travel Stipends & Grants
Governance
By-Laws
Board of Officers
Board Meeting Minutes
Committees
National Office
History of the APA
Reprinting Policies &
Permission Fees
Profession
Data
APA Statements
Average
Faculty Salaries
Advertising
Advertising
Advertising
in JFP
Schedules & Deadlines
Resources
Conferences, Seminars
& Calls for Papers
JobSeeker Database
Teaching Committee's
Online Resource Center
Streaming
Video
Philosophy
in the News
Prizes & Awards
Web Resources
Department Web Sites
Other Organizations of
Related Interest Publications & Merchandise
Publications
&
Merchandise
list
APA Newsletters
Other Publications
Schedules & Deadlines Member Services
Membership Info
Becoming a Member
Members Only Section
Login
Member Section Index
Services:
Membership Directory
Resources:
Jobs for Philosophers
APA Newsletters
Member Home Pages
Proceedings & Addresses
Grants, Fellowships and Prizes
Sabbatical
Housing
|
APA
Committee for Defense of
Professional Rights of Philosophers
1999
Report
Proceedings
& Addresses
Volume 73, Number 5
May 2000
Committee for the Defense of Professional
Rights of Philosophers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie
Francis, Outgoing Chair
This year,
the Committee concluded action on several complaints. One concerned
an alleged failure of due process in consideration for an honorific
rank. The Committee concluded that although there were some irregularities
in the process, they did not amount to a failure of due process in violation
of the faculty member's rights, because they were very minor, the process
had been extensive, and the rank at issue was an honorific rank in the
grace of the university system.
The second
complaint involved an alleged bad faith elimination of a junior position
almost immediately after the complainant's appointment. The Committee
concluded that although there was no proof the elimination had been
in bad faith, it at least indicated inadequate long-term planning on
the college's part that had significantly affected the career of a junior
philosopher. The Committee has a further request of the Board of Officers
with respect to this complaint, for action at this fall's Board meeting.
Four recent
complaints have been lodged with the Committee, but have not yet been
resolved. They include two complaints of failure of due process in tenure
denials, one complaint of inappropriate treatment during the appointments
process (including a failure to give adequate time to respond to an
offer of a position), and one complaint alleging discrimination and
retaliatory treatment. An additional complaint alleging sexual harassment
has been lodged with the new committee chair.
In addition,
the Committee has responded informally to a number of inquiries concerning
professional rights and professional practice.
One final
observation. The Committee continues to be concerned about the situations
of many junior members of the profession. The use of part time faculty
is reportedly continuing to rise, and such faculty frequently encounter
burdensome working conditions but lack legal protection against exploitation
and summary dismissal. Jobs as we all know are scarce, and mistreatment
of applicants and offerees in the appointments process appears to be
a growing issue for the profession. As Karen Hanson's committee on the
Priorities and Problems of the APA continues its work, it would be well
advised to pay attention to the situations of unemployed and underemployed
philosophers.
|