[ Return to APA Home Page ]

    Search
    Site Map
    Contact Us
    National Office News
    Letters to the Executive
     Director

Meetings & Divisions
    Secretary-Treasurers
    Central
    Eastern
    Pacific
    Annual Meetings
    Paper Submissions
    Travel Stipends & Grants

Governance
    By-Laws
    Board of Officers

    Board Meeting Minutes
    Committees
    National Office
    History of the APA
    Reprinting Policies &

      Permission Fees

Profession
    Data
    APA Statements
    Average Faculty Salaries

Advertising
    Advertising
    Advertising in JFP
    Schedules & Deadlines

Resources
    Conferences, Seminars
      & Calls for Papers

    JobSeeker Database
    Teaching Committee's
      Online Resource Center
    Streaming Video

    Philosophy in the News
    Prizes & Awards

    Web Resources
    Department Web Sites

    Other Organizations of
      Related Interest

Publications & Merchandise
    Publications &
    Merchandise list

    APA Newsletters

    Other Publications
    Schedules & Deadlines

Member Services
    Membership Info
    Becoming a Member

Members Only Section
    Login

    Member Section Index
  Services:

    Membership Directory
  Resources:
    Jobs for Philosophers
    APA Newsletters
    Member Home Pages
    Proceedings & Addresses
    Grants, Fellowships and Prizes
    Sabbatical Housing

APA Committee for Defense of
Professional Rights of Philosophers

1999 Report


Proceedings & Addresses
Volume 73, Number 5
May 2000
Committee for the Defense of Professional
Rights of Philosophers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leslie Francis, Outgoing Chair

This year, the Committee concluded action on several complaints. One concerned an alleged failure of due process in consideration for an honorific rank. The Committee concluded that although there were some irregularities in the process, they did not amount to a failure of due process in violation of the faculty member's rights, because they were very minor, the process had been extensive, and the rank at issue was an honorific rank in the grace of the university system.

The second complaint involved an alleged bad faith elimination of a junior position almost immediately after the complainant's appointment. The Committee concluded that although there was no proof the elimination had been in bad faith, it at least indicated inadequate long-term planning on the college's part that had significantly affected the career of a junior philosopher. The Committee has a further request of the Board of Officers with respect to this complaint, for action at this fall's Board meeting.

Four recent complaints have been lodged with the Committee, but have not yet been resolved. They include two complaints of failure of due process in tenure denials, one complaint of inappropriate treatment during the appointments process (including a failure to give adequate time to respond to an offer of a position), and one complaint alleging discrimination and retaliatory treatment. An additional complaint alleging sexual harassment has been lodged with the new committee chair.

In addition, the Committee has responded informally to a number of inquiries concerning professional rights and professional practice.

One final observation. The Committee continues to be concerned about the situations of many junior members of the profession. The use of part time faculty is reportedly continuing to rise, and such faculty frequently encounter burdensome working conditions but lack legal protection against exploitation and summary dismissal. Jobs as we all know are scarce, and mistreatment of applicants and offerees in the appointments process appears to be a growing issue for the profession. As Karen Hanson's committee on the Priorities and Problems of the APA continues its work, it would be well advised to pay attention to the situations of unemployed and underemployed philosophers.

 


Copyright 2000, The American Philosophical Association.
Last revised: May 22, 2003