[ Return to APA Home Page ]

APA NEWSLETTERS
    Philosophy and the Black
    Experience
        Jesse Taylor, Editor
    Philosophy and Computers
        Jon Dorbolo, Editor
    Feminism and Philosophy
        Joan Callahan, Editor
    Hispanic/Latino Issues in
    Philosophy
        Linda Alcoff, Comm. Chair
    Philosophy and Law
       Richard Nunan, Editor
    Philosophy and Lesbian,
    Gay, Bisexual and
    Transgender Issues
        Timothy Murphy, Editor
    Philosophy and Medicine
        Rosamond Rhodes, Editor
    Teaching Philosophy
        Tziporah Kasachkoff &
        Eugene Kelly, Co-Editors

Navigation
   
Newsletters Index (99:1)
    apaOnline Home Page

 

APA Newsletters
Fall 1999
Volume 99, Number 1


Newsletter on Philosophy and Medicine

Articles & Stories

Previous | Next


Web-Based Education in Bioethics: The Importance and the Future

Mark G. Kuczewski
Medical College of Wisconsin

The Import of Web-Based Education in Bioethics

In the 1990s, a considerable number of graduate programs in bioethics have sprung up at educational institutions around the nation. Most award a Master of Arts degree. These programs are structured in a variety of ways and the debate concerning their mission is lively. However, there is some consensus that these programs of study are meant to enhance the skills of clinicians who wish to better address ethical issues in their practice, or researchers who wish to enrich their scholarship through an interdisciplinary course of study. As such, these are often characterized as "value-added" degrees, much like Master of Public Health degrees.

The Master of Arts program in Bioethics at the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) was founded in 1992. It is located within the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and is the only M.A. program amidst a sea of basic science Ph.D. programs and a small but growing number of M.S. programs. Although we have had a small number of international students and students from around the nation, the program has mainly served the greater Milwaukee health care community. Because of the limitations imposed by the winters of the Midwest, it is difficult for students from beyond a fifty-mile radius to pursue study in our program.

These geographic limitations have been a source of frustration for our faculty. We believe that health care institutions everywhere need staff with extensive training in bioethics. Bioethics cannot be confined to major urban academic health-science centers and those fortunate enough to be located within geographic proximity. Furthermore, we think that the sporadic resources that ethics committee networks are able to supply to distant members may be helpful to staff who have extensive training in bioethics. But such network resources are seldom sufficient to provide training to those responsible for ethics education within a health care institution. So, even though the Midwest Ethics Committee Network (MECN) is based at MCW, we were highly motivated to develop web-based versions of some of our graduate offerings.

My initial idea was to create scaled-down versions of four of our courses, place them on the web, and provide continuing medical education credit rather than graduate credit for such coursework. In this way, distance education would always be a pale imitation of the classroom offering. However, we quickly found that we were underestimating what was possible. To my surprise, the first class I offered on the web was not inferior to the classroom version, but was actually superior.

The enrollees in our on-line courses are highly motivated individuals drawn from across the nation (and a small number of international students). They are directors of residency programs at teaching hospitals, faculty in nursing programs and rural colleges, physicians, administrators, information technology specialists, and nurses from a variety of types of institution. And a few are health-care professionals from rural Wisconsin.

Our on-line courses are not taught in real time but are, nevertheless, paced on a week-to-week basis. Each week, students complete a variety of assigned readings and log on to read an on-line lecture that brings together the themes of the readings and illustrates the main points, usually through extensive and detailed case illustrations. There is an assignment at the end of each unit. Students answer a short essay question or analyze a case.1 Some weeks, video clips of caregiver-patient interactions provide the starting point for analysis. The students e-mail their assignment to the class listserver. Then, they discuss each other’s answers for the remainder of the week. The level of discussion in our pilot program was exceptionally high and the volume overwhelming. It was here that the superiority of this format first showed itself.

The interaction among the students in a web-based course is not limited by the traditional two-hour format of the classroom. Every student can be required to participate and most feel quite comfortable doing so because the e-mail medium allows them to compose their thoughts prior to "speaking." Furthermore, as the instructor, I can provide individualized feedback to each student, usually on a weekly basis. I do not have to worry that speaking to an individual student will stifle the discussion since I am able to do this "off-list." And, the web-based nature of the course allows that students frequently surf to find their own additional resources and to share them with the group. In other words, the virtual classroom can be a much less teacher-centered environment that empowers students. Clearly this is the ideal with adult learners who bring such a wealth of experience to the classroom.2

 

The Future of Web-Based Instruction at MCW

Are there drawbacks to the web-based format? Indeed. Such courses are extremely faculty intensive. The creation of high-quality on-line lectures demands release time from other faculty duties. Furthermore, in a sense, class is always "in session," twenty-four-hours-a-day, and the ability to provide individualized feedback seems to carry its own imperative to do so. Personally, I find this demanding and suggest that this format will only work for faculty who find interaction with this kind of student intrinsically rewarding.

The other major drawback is the inverse of one of the strengths I mentioned earlier. Although the e-mail format of discussion allows for universal participation in a comfortable manner, it is not obvious how to develop the presentation skills of the student. In a traditional classroom, graduate students receive extensive experience in running seminar classes that develop their skills as peer educators and group facilitators. Written submission of one’s thoughts to a listserver cannot simulate these activities. These two drawbacks need to be overcome in our efforts to make web-based instruction a greater part of our curriculum.

At the moment, MCW only offers four courses for graduate credit via the World Wide Web. By completing these four courses, the student earns a "Certificate in Clinical Bioethics." It seems likely that the majority of persons who avail themselves of our distance learning program will be content to stop at this point. In addition, it is likely that many doctoral candidates in philosophy around the country will wish to participate in one or two of these courses and transfer the credit to their home institution. But, there are some who wish to be able to complete a Master of Arts entirely by distance education. We are making plans to accommodate such persons.

In general, we believe that a program that is entirely offered on the Web will have weaknesses.3 I noted earlier that there is a lack of opportunity to develop presentation and group facilitation skills. There is, perhaps, also a need to have some on-campus clinical ethics experience so that students can "see" and explore the moral dimension of cases directly with their mentors. We are currently working to design an M.A. track in our program that is modeled on an executive M.B.A. model. Namely, we hope that we can create short, intensive summer offerings, perhaps as early as summer 2000, which can provide educational experiences that remedy these deficiencies and provide a complete and well-rounded graduate experience in bioethics. This track will likely feature morning clinical experiences, followed by discussion with a preceptor. Afternoons will feature in-depth seminar-style discussions on a variety of topics. We believe that this approach might finally allow us to fulfill the mission that our program embraced at its inception.

For more information, visit our Web page, www.mcw.edu/bioethics, or e-mail markk@mcw.edu.

Endnotes

1. Case illustration and discussion is an extremely important part of our program. This component is vital to making the on-line "lectures" clear and in facilitating lively and fruitful discussion in the course. Copious use is made of casebooks such as Mark G. Kuczewski and Rosa Lynn Pinkus, An Ethics Casebook for Hospitals: Practical Approaches to Everyday Cases (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1999), and Terrence Ackerman and Carson Strong, A Casebook of Medical Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).

2. The pilot course is the subject of a doctoral dissertation in information sciences that documents many of these properties of the program. See Elizabeth Buchanan, "Dialogue, Empowerment, and Distance Education," University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI, 1999.

3. Of course, there are many prestigious institutions, such as Johns Hopkins University and Stanford University, that are making some degree programs, e.g., public health and electrical engineering, respectively, available entirely in this manner.


Previous | Next


Copyright 2000, The American Philosophical Association.
Last revised: May 16, 2001