![[ Return to APA Home Page ]](../../../../pix/new.gif)
APA NEWSLETTERS
Philosophy
and the Black
Experience
Jesse Taylor, Editor
Philosophy and Computers
Jon Dorbolo, Editor
Feminism and Philosophy
Joan Callahan, Editor
Hispanic/Latino Issues in
Philosophy
Linda Alcoff, Comm. Chair
Philosophy and Law
Richard Nunan, Editor
Philosophy and Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual and
Transgender Issues
Timothy Murphy, Editor
Philosophy and Medicine
Rosamond Rhodes, Editor
Teaching Philosophy
Tziporah Kasachkoff &
Eugene Kelly, Co-EditorsNavigation
Newsletters Index (99:1)
apaOnline
Home Page
|
APA
Newsletters
Fall 1999
Volume 99, Number 1
Newsletter on Philosophy and
Medicine
Articles & Stories
Previous
| Next
Web-Based Education in Bioethics: The Importance
and the Future
Mark G. Kuczewski
Medical College of Wisconsin
The Import of Web-Based Education in Bioethics
In the 1990s, a considerable number of graduate programs in bioethics have sprung up at
educational institutions around the nation. Most award a Master of Arts degree. These
programs are structured in a variety of ways and the debate concerning their mission is
lively. However, there is some consensus that these programs of study are meant to enhance
the skills of clinicians who wish to better address ethical issues in their practice, or
researchers who wish to enrich their scholarship through an interdisciplinary course of
study. As such, these are often characterized as "value-added" degrees, much
like Master of Public Health degrees.
The Master of Arts program in Bioethics at the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) was
founded in 1992. It is located within the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and is
the only M.A. program amidst a sea of basic science Ph.D. programs and a small but growing
number of M.S. programs. Although we have had a small number of international students and
students from around the nation, the program has mainly served the greater Milwaukee
health care community. Because of the limitations imposed by the winters of the Midwest,
it is difficult for students from beyond a fifty-mile radius to pursue study in our
program.
These geographic limitations have been a source of frustration for our faculty. We
believe that health care institutions everywhere need staff with extensive training in
bioethics. Bioethics cannot be confined to major urban academic health-science centers and
those fortunate enough to be located within geographic proximity. Furthermore, we think
that the sporadic resources that ethics committee networks are able to supply to distant
members may be helpful to staff who have extensive training in bioethics. But such network
resources are seldom sufficient to provide training to those responsible for ethics
education within a health care institution. So, even though the Midwest Ethics Committee
Network (MECN) is based at MCW, we were highly motivated to develop web-based versions of
some of our graduate offerings.
My initial idea was to create scaled-down versions of four of our courses, place them
on the web, and provide continuing medical education credit rather than graduate credit
for such coursework. In this way, distance education would always be a pale imitation of
the classroom offering. However, we quickly found that we were underestimating what was
possible. To my surprise, the first class I offered on the web was not inferior to the
classroom version, but was actually superior.
The enrollees in our on-line courses are highly motivated individuals drawn from across
the nation (and a small number of international students). They are directors of residency
programs at teaching hospitals, faculty in nursing programs and rural colleges,
physicians, administrators, information technology specialists, and nurses from a variety
of types of institution. And a few are health-care professionals from rural Wisconsin.
Our on-line courses are not taught in real time but are, nevertheless, paced on a
week-to-week basis. Each week, students complete a variety of assigned readings and log on
to read an on-line lecture that brings together the themes of the readings and illustrates
the main points, usually through extensive and detailed case illustrations. There is an
assignment at the end of each unit. Students answer a short essay question or analyze a
case. 1 Some weeks, video clips of caregiver-patient interactions provide
the starting point for analysis. The students e-mail their assignment to the class
listserver. Then, they discuss each others answers for the remainder of the week.
The level of discussion in our pilot program was exceptionally high and the volume
overwhelming. It was here that the superiority of this format first showed itself.
The interaction among the students in a web-based course is not limited by the
traditional two-hour format of the classroom. Every student can be required to participate
and most feel quite comfortable doing so because the e-mail medium allows them to compose
their thoughts prior to "speaking." Furthermore, as the instructor, I can
provide individualized feedback to each student, usually on a weekly basis. I do not have
to worry that speaking to an individual student will stifle the discussion since I am able
to do this "off-list." And, the web-based nature of the course allows that
students frequently surf to find their own additional resources and to share them with the
group. In other words, the virtual classroom can be a much less teacher-centered
environment that empowers students. Clearly this is the ideal with adult learners who
bring such a wealth of experience to the classroom. 2
The Future of Web-Based Instruction at MCW
Are there drawbacks to the web-based format? Indeed. Such courses are extremely faculty
intensive. The creation of high-quality on-line lectures demands release time from other
faculty duties. Furthermore, in a sense, class is always "in session,"
twenty-four-hours-a-day, and the ability to provide individualized feedback seems to carry
its own imperative to do so. Personally, I find this demanding and suggest that this
format will only work for faculty who find interaction with this kind of student
intrinsically rewarding.
The other major drawback is the inverse of one of the strengths I mentioned earlier.
Although the e-mail format of discussion allows for universal participation in a
comfortable manner, it is not obvious how to develop the presentation skills of the
student. In a traditional classroom, graduate students receive extensive experience in
running seminar classes that develop their skills as peer educators and group
facilitators. Written submission of ones thoughts to a listserver cannot simulate
these activities. These two drawbacks need to be overcome in our efforts to make web-based
instruction a greater part of our curriculum.
At the moment, MCW only offers four courses for graduate credit via the World Wide Web.
By completing these four courses, the student earns a "Certificate in Clinical
Bioethics." It seems likely that the majority of persons who avail themselves of our
distance learning program will be content to stop at this point. In addition, it is likely
that many doctoral candidates in philosophy around the country will wish to participate in
one or two of these courses and transfer the credit to their home institution. But, there
are some who wish to be able to complete a Master of Arts entirely by distance education.
We are making plans to accommodate such persons.
In general, we believe that a program that is entirely offered on the Web will have
weaknesses. 3 I noted earlier that there is a lack of opportunity to develop
presentation and group facilitation skills. There is, perhaps, also a need to have some
on-campus clinical ethics experience so that students can "see" and explore the
moral dimension of cases directly with their mentors. We are currently working to design
an M.A. track in our program that is modeled on an executive M.B.A. model. Namely, we hope
that we can create short, intensive summer offerings, perhaps as early as summer 2000,
which can provide educational experiences that remedy these deficiencies and provide a
complete and well-rounded graduate experience in bioethics. This track will likely feature
morning clinical experiences, followed by discussion with a preceptor. Afternoons will
feature in-depth seminar-style discussions on a variety of topics. We believe that this
approach might finally allow us to fulfill the mission that our program embraced at its
inception.
For more information, visit our Web page, www.mcw.edu/bioethics,
or e-mail markk@mcw.edu.
Endnotes
1. Case illustration and discussion is an extremely important part of
our program. This component is vital to making the on-line "lectures" clear and
in facilitating lively and fruitful discussion in the course. Copious use is made of
casebooks such as Mark G. Kuczewski and Rosa Lynn Pinkus, An Ethics Casebook for Hospitals:
Practical Approaches to Everyday Cases (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press,
1999), and Terrence Ackerman and Carson Strong, A Casebook of Medical Ethics (New
York: Oxford University Press, 1989).
2. The pilot course is the subject of a doctoral dissertation in
information sciences that documents many of these properties of the program. See Elizabeth
Buchanan, "Dialogue, Empowerment, and Distance Education," University
Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI, 1999.
3. Of course, there are many prestigious institutions, such as Johns
Hopkins University and Stanford University, that are making some degree programs, e.g.,
public health and electrical engineering, respectively, available entirely in this manner.
Previous
| Next |