Andrew Kelley
Bradley University
More and more, I find that the manner in which students evaluate
their courses and their education in general is drawn from their experience as consumers.
Thus, in teaching introductory philosophy courses, the factor that has given rise to the
most problems for me is being able to deal with this consumer mentality of students. By
"consumer mentality," I mean the attitude whereby students view their classes
and their education solely in terms of a product that they are purchasing or a service
that they are being rendered. In the past few years I have had the opportunity to teach at
institutions ranging from large state universities, to community colleges and small
liberal arts schools, and I have seen that this mentality appears in all of these
settings. In this short piece, I would like to provide some strategies that have aided me
in coping with this mentality in introductory-type philosophy courses.
What the consumer mentality reinforces in many of our students is
the idea that a good product is one that has immediate and tangible results. Because of
this expectation, the standard for a good course or a worthwhile discipline is one that
involves the quick and easy conveyance of a product. Thus, in education the product is
understood to be not only information, but information that has direct relevance to a
chosen career path. However, philosophy, by its very nature, tends to be antithetical to
many of the ideals that are reinforced by this consumer mentality-perhaps more so than any
other discipline. Because philosophy courses tend to focus on the process of asking
questions and the process of arriving at answers as much as they do on the answers
themselves, beginning students often have difficulty in seeing the value of what they are
experiencing. Philosophical questions are difficult to "resolve," let alone
address, within the confines of an hour, a week, or even a semester. Finally, although
there is a growing literature on such topics as the environment, biomedical ethics,
business ethics, etc., philosophy has never been directed toward the preparation for any
specific profession.
The consumer mentality is too pervasive for any professor to
overcome it completely in one course. However, below I give some strategies for coping
with this mentality that I have used with some measure of success in my introductory
philosophy classes.
1. Begin the semester with a unit on the value and purpose of
education.
More and more, students view their time at college or university
solely as vocational training. Many students have never been asked to think seriously
about what education is or should be. Hence, if they do not see a direct connection
between the course in which they are enrolled and their chosen career path, they may view
the course as a waste of time. I have found that if I begin an introductory philosophy
course with a unit on liberal education as contrasted with vocational training, some
students become more accepting of philosophy and the goals of a philosophy course.
2. Show students that much can be learned from issues that are
difficult to resolve.
Because the consumer mentality of many of our students conditions
them to see value in terms of tangibility and immediacy, and because philosophical issues
do not admit of easy and/or determinate answers, philosophy seems to them unworthy of
attention. Students must be shown that it is not the expectation of coming to a resolution
of a philosophical issue that makes that issue important, but rather that in thinking
through an issue, we learn an immense amount about our current values, principles, and
beliefs, and perhaps also about the values, principles, and beliefs that it is worthwhile
having. We must show students that even if we cannot come to a final conclusion on some
philosophical issue, the process of analyzing the issue can teach them much about
themselves and where they stand.
3. Focus the course around one major theme that will be important
to the students, then bring other major philosophical issues in "through the back
door."
I used to teach introductory philosophy courses by spending
several weeks each on certain major, although loosely related, topics such as "free
will," "the existence of God," "deontological ethics versus
consequentialist ethics," etc. I gradually found that students became frustrated with
the course because they had difficulty seeing the relevance of the individual topics to
issues that were important for their lives. One can, for example, make forgiveness the
topic of the course. In the course of discussing forgiveness, one can bring in more
traditional philosophical topics, such as personal identity. When we forgive a person for
a transgression, we need to know what characteristics make the person we forgive the same
person as the one who committed the transgression. The topic of free will may also be
addressed insofar as forgiveness might be a moot point if there is no free will.
Furthermore, the nature of forgiveness as either a duty or as something that simply has
good consequences necessitates a discussion of deontological and consequentialist ethics.
Finally, epistemological issues could be raised insofar as it may be important to be able
to know when one has forgiven or what justifies one in believing that one has truly
forgiven or been forgiven.
It would seem to me that a professor could set up similar courses
focused on topics such as the good life, the value of a career, libertarianism versus
state paternalism, etc.
4. Make students realize that they are "getting
somewhere."
Oftentimes students become frustrated because it is not always
easy in a philosophy course to see that one is making progress. However, there is an
effective way in which students can be helped to realize that they are indeed
"getting somewhere." At the very beginning of the semester, the professor can
either ask students to write a short essay about their initial opinions on the topic that
is the focus of the course, or have the students fill out a questionnaire about attitudes,
ideas, and views relating to philosophical issues that they will encounter over the course
of the semester. At midsemester, the instructor can then have students write an essay on
the same topic, or fill out the same questionnaire without allowing the students to look
over their submissions from the first day of the semester. Finally, at the end of the
semester, the instructor can ask her students to read the first two essays or
questionnaires and then to write an evaluation of how their views and values on the
topic(s) have evolved during the semester. Both exercises force the students to become
aware of the very evolution that they are going through by forcing them to take note of
how they have changed their thinking about the subject(s), and the reasons that have led
to those changes.
5. Make discussions task-oriented.
I have always considered student discussion to be an important
part of a philosophy class. Unfortunately, students can become frustrated with class
discussions for several reasons. First, some students believe that they can only gain
something when it comes from the professor's mouth. As a result, such students often view
segments of class devoted to discussion as a waste of time because they see it merely as
an opportunity for outspoken classmates to voice their own "irrelevant" views.
Second, small group discussion sometimes degenerate into "bull" sessions. Third,
since the professor may not be present for the whole discussion of any one group, students
believe that they will not be held responsible for what they discussed, and hence, may
view the discussion as pointless. There are several ways of helping students to see that
time granted to student discussion is important. First, the groups-whether large or
small-should always be given a specific task to complete and in a short amount of time.
With a specific task and only several minutes for discussion, the amount of idle chatter
will be reduced to a minimum. Second, if possible, hand out the tasks the period before
they are required and make the tasks involve picking out material from the reading. Third,
make it clear to students that, because they all have participated in the discussions, any
one of them may be called upon to present findings of the group. Indicate to them that
they will be held responsible for knowing the material addressed in these discussions on
exams and in papers. Finally, regularly make the discussion assignments focus on reviewing
the material that the professor has presented during the class. This will serve to
reinforce the ideas that the professor has raised in the class and will appease those
students who think that they are only getting their money's worth when they are hearing
the professor speak.
6. Write out objectives for each class period, express these
objectives to the students, and then reiterate them at the end of the class period.
Although much can be gained from allowing the material and the
class discussion to determine the flow and direction of the course, it can often be
difficult for many students to see what they are getting from the course as a whole or
each individual session, when they do not see an apparent structure. Hence, inform
students of objectives at the beginning of each class period, and then reiterate them at
the end of the hour. Such a practice shows the students that the professor is, in fact,
taking them in a particular direction and that, by the end of the hour, they have arrived
at the goal they were aiming for. If a professor wants to allow for the possibility of
days or discussions in which the students or the readings determine the direction of the
discussion or the flow of the session, then she can build this in to the process by
telling students that sometimes she will allow discussions to follow their own direction.
7. Make all expectations for assignments explicit so that there
can be no room for confusion about what is being demanded of the students.
An "Introduction to Philosophy" class will usually be
the first time that students have been asked to write and think philosophically. They can
become frustrated because many times they have no idea where to begin in constructing a
good philosophy essay or paper. Thus, prepare students for the type of thinking and work
that you expect from them by providing them with a sample of what would you would consider
to be a good response to an essay question. Better yet, spend class time literally
constructing a model response for an exam essay or a model outline for a paper; take them
step by step through the thinking, editing, and revising processes. Even for students who
have had a significant background in writing, such an exercise can serve as a good review.
8. Teach material that you like instead of material that you feel
you must cover.
Because a large number of the students in our introductory courses
will never continue on with philosophy, it is not as crucial for them to acquire "the
canon" as it may be for philosophy majors and minors. A large part of how the
students view the course and how they will wind up viewing philosophy in general will
depend on how the material is presented. The instructor's enthusiasm is of crucial
importance. Thus, it is important that the instructor teach what he likes. If the
instructor is not excited about the material or the way the course is set up, he will not
be able to convey enthusiasm about philosophy to his students.