Book Reviews
Previous | Next
Peter Abelard, Ethical Writings: Ethics and Dialogues
between a Philosopher, a Jew and a Christian
Translated by Paul Vincent Spade, with an introduction by Marilyn McCord Adams
Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1995.
Reviewed by August Viglione
Instituto Orientale, Naples, Italy
This book contains a translation of several of Peter Abelard's
works on ethics, and a detailed introduction by Marilyn McCord Adams, who helps to bring
the two works into focus for the modern reader. In the translator's introduction, Spade
explains the reason for a new translation of these works. Although he acknowledges using
the translations of Luscombe and of Payer, respectively, for the Ethics and the Dialogue,
he maintains that his translation has brought to perfection the earlier translations. This
certainly would be a sufficient reason for a new translation of so important a figure in
the world of medieval philosophy as Peter Abelard. Spade's translation and his notes to
these translations certainly help the reader to get a better view of the complexity, and
in some cases even the modernity, of Abelard. However there is a shortcoming, or at least
an oversight, on the part of Spade, inasmuch as he leaves the reader without the Latin
text to consult. The reader cannot be expected to find the text that Spade used for his
translations nor trust that his translations are necessarily the most valid. Also
considering the variety of even fifteenth-century (preprinting) editions of the Bible,
perhaps Spade should have tried where possible to find the edition of the Bible which
Abelard actually used in his quotations. This holds for the other works cited, as well. It
might be an insurmountable task, but given the claims he made for this translation, Spade
should have attempted to show that he had thoroughly researched the material that Abelard
had in front of him, and had searched the available editions for possible variant readings
of his text. Purportedly complete and accurate translations such as Spade's run the risk
of being undermined by textual criticisms of an external kind.
Despite these observations, Marilyn McCord Adams and Paul Vincent
Spade have made an admirable attempt at interpreting and translating Peter Abelard's Ethics
and Dialogue. The authors could have added, however, a historical note or two
with regard to the historical contexts of Abelard's life. His early life coincides with
the preaching and launching of the First Crusade and his later life coincides with the
launching of the subsequent Crusades. The late eleventh century and early twelfth century
is a frenetic anti-Infidel period in Western European history, yet it barely seems to have
affected Abelard. These facts are cited only to further magnify Abelard's significance in
medieval history. Moreover, we are confronted in some of Abelard's statements with
positions that a modern theologian would probably hesitate to make with the same
equanimity, and some historical background would help make clear the somewhat aberrant
nature of Abelard's thought. For instance Abelard clearly draws the distinction between a
sin through action and a sin through fault when he says that: "Thus those who
persecuted Christ or his followers and believed they should be persecuted, we say sinned
through action. Nevertheless, they would have sinned more seriously through fault if they
had spared them contrary to conscience" (pp. 24-25, 29 [Ethics (110)(112)(131)]). To
make a like statement at any time other than the present could have seemed heresy, but to
state it in the early twelfth century was very bold, to say the least, even if the
persecutors of Christ were not Infidels but presumably Jews.
I would recommend this text for students of the classics, as well
as for philosophy majors. It is a commendable effort in the ongoing search for a deeper
understanding of the European Middle Ages. The good points far outweigh the few limited
shortcomings.