![[ Return to APA Home Page ]](../../../../pix/new.gif)
A Message from
the National OfficeGuidelines for Submissions
APA NEWSLETTERS
Philosophy
and the Black
Experience
Jesse Taylor, Editor
Philosophy and Computers
Jon Dorbolo, Editor
Feminism and Philosophy
Joan Callahan, Editor
Hispanic/Latino Issues in
Philosophy
Linda Alcoff, Comm. Chair
Philosophy and Law
Richard Nunan, Editor
Philosophy and Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual and
Transgender Issues
Timothy Murphy, Editor
Philosophy and Medicine
Rosamond Rhodes, Editor
Teaching Philosophy
Tziporah Kasachkoff &
Eugene Kelly, Co-Editors
Navigation
Newsletters Index (99:2)
apaOnline
Home Page
|
APA
Newsletters
Spring 2000
Volume 99, Number 2
Newsletter on Philosophy and
Law
Abstracts:
Recent Law Review Articles of Interest
Previous | Next
Christensen, Craig W. "If not Marriage? On
Securing Gay and Lesbian Family Values by a Simulacrum of Marriage," 66 Fordham
Law Review 1733 (1998)
A fascinating review of what hasand hasntbeen done in various
jurisdictions in this country and in Europe (especially Hawaii and Denmark) with respect
to the strategy of affording same-sex couples a formalized civil substitute for a marriage
license: so-called registered partnerships or domestic partnerships. Perhaps the most
intriguing element in Christiansens review is his account of the nature and
legislative history of Hawaiis brand of domestic partnership law, styled a
"reciprocal beneficiary relationship."
Compared to other domestic efforts, the scope of Hawaiis domestic partnership law
is positively breathtaking. There the participation in public employee spousal and family
benefit plans is statewide, and goes beyond health care to include participation as
beneficiaries in the public employee retirement system. The law has analogous provisions
requiring most private employers to extend spousal and family health care plans to
employees domestic partners and their children, although these provisions are
currently under attack in the federal courts. In addition, Hawaiis law secures for
registered domestic partners some inheritance rights, workers compensation survivor
benefits, the right to pursue wrongful death suits, and domestic abuse protections.
On the other hand, the action of Hawaiis legislature falls well short of the
Governors Commission recommendation it professed to follow, under which domestic
partners "shall have the same rights and obligations under the law that are conferred
on spouses in a marriage relationship," for which the Commission suggested an
elegantly simple implementation strategy: require that the term "domestic
partner shall be included in any definition or use of the terms spouse,
family, immediate family, or dependent as those terms
are used throughout the law." What the state legislature offered was far less global.
In particular, it balked at addressing the issue of joint taxation (which is sometimes
advantageous for couples, and sometimes not), at expanding spousal testimonial privileges
in criminal and civil trials, at the question of financial support or distribution of
property at the termination of a domestic partnership, and at securing legal support for
domestic partners as potential parents, even though such a support network is already in
place for heterosexual parents. This article provides interesting background with respect
to what might be unfolding in Vermont over the next year. (See Editors
Introduction.)
Previous
| Next |